Independent. No paid placements.Reviewed as findings changeEditorial policyNewsletter
The Credit RecordAn independent record of credit repair and debt settlement companies

Last reviewed: 16 September 2026

HomeThe LibraryOrderly Payment of Debts, explained

Orderly Payment of Debts: Canada's other insolvency option, explained

Our own bankruptcy vs. consumer proposal explainer covers the two paths most people mean when they say "filing for insolvency" in Canada — both run under the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), and both require a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) to administer them. The BIA actually contains a third mechanism, tucked into its Part X and rarely discussed alongside the other two: the Orderly Payment of Debts (OPD) program, also called a consolidation order. It doesn't involve an LIT, it doesn't reduce what you owe, and — unlike the rest of the BIA — it isn't available everywhere in Canada at all.

A consolidation, not a settlement

Part X of the BIA, added to the Act in 1966, lets an insolvent individual apply to the clerk of the court in their own province for a "consolidation order": an order combining their unsecured debts into a single regular payment made into court, which the clerk then distributes to creditors from a consolidation account opened in the debtor's name. The order runs at a fixed 5% annual interest rate on the consolidated balance, with a repayment period capped at three years. The distinguishing feature, next to the consumer proposal our bankruptcy explainer covers, is that OPD requires repaying the debt in full — the benefit on offer is one predictable combined payment and protection from collection action while you pay, not the principal forgiveness a negotiated consumer proposal can deliver.

Only four provinces currently run it

Part X is federal law, but — unlike most of the BIA — it doesn't take effect automatically nationwide. A province has to be specifically brought under Part X by proclamation before its residents can use it, and a province that once ran a program can also stop administering it without the underlying federal section itself being repealed. As of this writing, only Alberta, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island, and Nova Scotia have an active OPD program. Manitoba and British Columbia each operated one in the past and wound it down: B.C.'s dedicated Debtors Assistance Branch, which had administered the province's program, closed in 2002 amid provincial budget cuts, even though Part X's underlying federal authority for the province was never itself repealed — the mechanism has simply had no active local administrator there for more than two decades.

A concrete example of the difference: an insolvent Ontario resident and an insolvent Alberta resident carrying an identical unsecured-debt load have genuinely different menus available to them. Both can pursue a consumer proposal or bankruptcy through an LIT, available nationwide under the BIA's other provisions. Only the Alberta resident can additionally choose OPD — full repayment, spread over up to three years at 5% interest, filed through the court clerk rather than an LIT. The Ontario resident has no OPD option at all, active federal statute or not.

Who it actually binds — and when a creditor has to agree

OPD is for insolvent individuals with unsecured debt; it doesn't reach secured debt like a mortgage or car loan, and it excludes business debt and income tax debt. A specific rule decides how much say a creditor gets: a consolidation order that doesn't pay every registered creditor's debt in full within three years can't be issued at all unless every registered creditor consents to it in writing — but a creditor who simply doesn't respond to a consent request within 30 days is deemed to have consented, so silence favors the debtor rather than blocking the order. There's a real consequence for falling behind, too: if a debtor defaults on the payments a consolidation order requires and that default continues for three months, the registered creditors regain the right to pursue their individual claims directly against the debtor, unless the debtor applies to the court and shows the default was beyond their control.

Administered locally, not by a Licensed Insolvency Trustee

Because OPD runs outside the LIT-administered part of the BIA, it sits outside the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy's trustee-licensing system our own bankruptcy explainer describes, and outside the voluntary accreditation our credit-counselling explainer covers. Each of the four active provinces designates its own local program administrator — in practice, a nonprofit credit-counselling-type organization operating under contract with the provincial government, not a government office itself and not a Licensed Insolvency Trustee — who verifies the debtor's income, works out the consolidated payment amount, and files the court application on the debtor's behalf.

Quebec runs a comparable-looking program on entirely different, provincial law

Quebec never adopted Part X. It runs its own, older mechanism instead: "voluntary deposit," a court-supervised process under the province's Code of Civil Procedure that lets a debtor make regular payments into court toward their unsecured debts. Registering triggers the same basic protection OPD offers — for as long as the debtor keeps up their payments, creditors can't seize income or property or sue over the deposited debts, and the running of any prescription period against those debts is suspended — and it reduces the interest rate on those debts to 5% (or leaves it alone if it was already lower). Creditors have 30 days after notice to file a claim for what they're owed, and the court clerk then uses the deposited funds to pay them down over time. The shape is close to OPD's, but the legal foundation is entirely separate — Quebec civil-procedure law, not the federal BIA — the same "no single nationwide mechanism" pattern our other Canadian explainers describe for credit reporting and debt collection.

OPD is a real option, not a "better bankruptcy alternative" by default. It commits you to repaying every dollar you owe plus 5% interest, over as long as three years — a materially bigger commitment than a consumer proposal, which can reduce the amount actually owed and is available in every province through an LIT. And it exists at all only if you live in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island, or Nova Scotia (or, under Quebec's own separate voluntary-deposit process, in Quebec). If you're weighing it, compare it directly against a free initial consultation with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee before deciding — see our own bankruptcy vs. consumer proposal explainer for how that comparison works.

References

  1. Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, Part X ("Orderly Payment of Debts"), added to the Act in 1966 and brought into force only in a province that proclaims it, including s. 219(1) (application to the clerk of the court for a consolidation order), s. 220 (registration and opening of a consolidation account), and s. 221 (creditor objection procedure) — independently cross-checked across multiple, separately authored Licensed-Insolvency-Trustee-firm and legal-reference summaries (including Spergel, MNP Ltd., Frederick & Company, and Bankruptcy Canada) describing the same mechanism, the same section references, and the same 1966 origin and proclamation requirement.
  2. Orderly Payment of Debts Regulations, C.R.C., c. 369, made under Part X — provincial-administrator framework and application-fee provisions; independently cross-checked against multiple secondary summaries of the same regulatory structure.
  3. Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, s. 219 (a consolidation order that does not provide for payment in full of all referred debts within three years shall not be issued unless all registered creditors consent to it in writing, and a registered creditor who does not respond to a request for consent within thirty days is deemed to have consented) — independently confirmed via the Act's own text on the Justice Laws website (laws-lois.justice.gc.ca) and corroborated by multiple, separately authored Licensed-Insolvency-Trustee-firm sources (including MNP Ltd., Spergel, and Frederick & Company) describing the same fixed 5% annual interest rate, three-year repayment cap, full-repayment requirement, exclusion of secured/business/income-tax debt, and the 3-month-default provision returning creditors to individual enforcement absent a court finding the default was beyond the debtor's control.
  4. Current provincial availability (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island, and Nova Scotia) and British Columbia's discontinued program — the closure of its Debtors Assistance Branch in 2002 amid provincial budget cuts, without repeal of Part X's underlying federal proclamation for the province — independently corroborated across multiple, separately authored consumer-debt and insolvency-industry sources describing the same four currently active provinces and the same B.C. and Manitoba program history.
  5. Gouvernement du Québec, "About the voluntary deposit" and "Protection granted to the debtor and its limits" (quebec.ca) — official description of Quebec's voluntary-deposit process under the Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR c. C-25.01: reduction of interest on deposited debts to 5%, protection from seizure and lawsuit and suspension of prescription for as long as payments continue, and the court clerk's role in registering and distributing deposits; independently cross-checked against Éducaloi's (a Quebec nonprofit legal-information organization) public "Voluntary Deposit" explainer describing the same mechanics and the 30-day creditor claim window.

Related